#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 how to
#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 upgrade
#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 windows

The Gimp 2.2 is very good and complete for what I do (you can use clone tool to correct skin, etc) and there is a plugin to make it work just like CS2 (it will look and work just like photoshop) if you want. It looks like it preserves the 'ratio.'Д¬S2 is excellent from what I hear, but I don't know if I needed. In The Gimp you can also rotate crops to any degree: layer/transfrom/arbitrвЂ‹ary rotation. I am not sure what 'preserving ratio' means. GIMP is of course the best option for *NIX enthusiasts, and (pirates aside) unquestionably gives the best bang for your buck. On a budget, I'd say PS Pro, Elements 3 and the GIMP are the best options.

#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 how to

An important advantage of Photoshop over the GIMP (as well as most any other similar program) is that there are more people out there using PS, so it's easier to find help or how to do perform a given task.Дespite what the GIMP can do (and it's always getting better), Photoshop is simply more professional, has more, does more and creates a better workflow. If you haven't tried it recently, then you might be interested in looking at it again.

#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 windows

Its interface is much nicer, it has several more features and it also runs much more stably in Windows (this is probably more the GTK than GIMP). I should add that the current version of GIMP (2.2) is vastly improved over what was available a couple of years ago. That's something you quickly get used to and IMO not really an argument unless there is something about an interface you just can't stand. The user interface of Photoshop is likely to seem awkward if you are going from GIMP to PS, just as the GIMP is likely to seem awkward if going from PS to GIMP. Nevertheless, my impression is there are really very few important things PS can do that the GIMP can't.

Beyond plug-ins and filters, there are several small things and a few important things that PS either has that GIMP doesn't, or else implements better. I realized the other day that PS allows you to rotate crops and change its sides while preserving ratio, and GIMP doesn't. This can be a pain if you work with RAW very much, unless you are happy to use a different program to convert the RAWs to another lossless format, although I think that working directly with RAW must be better. It has fewer plug-ins than PS and I'm fairly sure it doesn't support RAW images directly (PSE3 now does). I used the GIMP a couple years before PS, but more for general image manipulation and less for photography. I hear that CS compares pretty well to CS2. New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side. Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch? A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!

For the simple shots, RSE saves the conversion info so I can delete the big tiff file & save a lot of hard drive space in the long run.ДЇind the light. I usually only go into PS to crop, resize & do some final sharpening with an Action unless it's a complex shot.

#Gimp vs photoshop cs2 upgrade

The combination of RSE & PS7 are good enough that I see no reason to upgrade to PSCS2.ДЇor 'normal' shots I shoot RAW & use the free RSE (RawShooter Essentials) since it came out & wouldn't be without it now. I'm using PS7 now & it does everything I need it to. It has some filters that I thought were better than PS. The most important lacking feature I noticed was the magnetic lassoДЄKA23, I think I used it once in the last 3 years & found that I still don't like it.